论文部分内容阅读
基于对外部性和交易本质的理解,当前生产外部性和消费外部性两分的观点有失偏颇。研究提出“交易外部性”概念,即产权交易过程中,交易一方或交易以外的行为主体的权利(束)或权利部分职能被交易另一方强制利用而未被定价或实现对等补偿的现象。据此,按照发生领域和作用主体的不同,外部性可以划分为生产外部性、消费外部性和交易外部性三类,其中,交易外部性进一步包含一类交易外部性、二类交易外部性和三类交易外部性。此处的“二类交易外部性”与史普博的“内部性”具有相同的本质内涵,即“内部性”实质是“交易外部性”范畴下的一个子分类。
Based on the understanding of the nature of externalities and transactions, there is a biased view of the current dichotomy between production externality and consumer externality. The research proposes the concept of “transactional externalities”, that is, during the transaction of property rights, the rights (bundles) or rights functions of the party other than the transaction or the transaction are forcibly utilized by the other party of the transaction and are not priced or equalized phenomenon. Accordingly, in accordance with the different spheres of occurrence and main body of action, the externalities can be divided into three categories: production externalities, consumer externalities and transaction externalities. Transactional externalities further include one type of transactional externalities, two types of transactional externalities and Three types of transactional externalities. The “externality of the second kind of transaction” here has the same essential connotation as that of the “externality” of Spurbet that the essence of “innerness ” is a sub-category under the category of “transactional externality” classification.