论文部分内容阅读
近读朱培尔先生的《“技进乎道”·一个未竟的使命》一文,感同身受,这是笔者多年来读到的一篇有关书法的好文章,思考的深度也反映出作者的理论与实践的深度,我十分赞同作者的以下观点:“技法是书法创作中的一个关键元素。但是如果说当代书法对古代高超技巧的接受已经超过了前人,显然又是以偏概全的,这是因为当代书法对技巧的接受是很有局限的。为什么会产生这种情况?归根到底是古人对书法技巧的把握,并不是他们关注的首要问题,甚至不是一件特别在意的事情。书法的基因在古代的传承并不
It is a good essay on calligraphy that the author has read for many years, and the depth of his reflection also reflects the fact that the close reading of Mr. Juppel’s ”“ The depth of theory and practice, I very much agree with the author’s point of view: ”technique is a key element in the creation of calligraphy, but if contemporary calligraphy accepted the ancient superb skills than its predecessors, apparently it is too general This is because contemporary calligraphy is very limited in its acceptance of the technique.Why did this happen? After all, the ancients’ mastery of calligraphy skills was not the primary concern of them or even a matter of particular concern Calligraphy genes are not inherited in ancient times