“我认为演员不需要理论,理论是别人的……”这是丛珊同志在“上海电影艺术爱好者沙龙”举行的“《良家妇女》导演报告会”上,做为女主演回答与会者提出的问题时所说的一段话。看来,这种观点不限于丛珊一人,也是相当一部分演员所共同持有的。就此,我愿借贵刊一块宝地与丛珊等同志商榷,谈谈我的看法。艺术家须以作品说话,表演艺术家的作品,就是诉堵舞台、银幕、荧屏的完整的生动感人的艺术形象。是的,很多驰名于世的大明星、表演艺术家们,塑造出了众多的,得到世人公认的艺术形象,但他们并没有什么伟大的表演学著述存留人间,平常的言谈也很少触及高深的理论领域。由此似乎我们可以作结论肯定丛珊同志的观点了,其实不然。艺术家对自己作品的反思既是一种总结,而总结的本身就是向理沦的升华。丛珊在《牧马人》摄毕后作过总结,谈到了自己的成绩与不足,《良家妇女》完 “I think the actors do not need theory and theory is others ...” This is the comrade Conghan’s “Good Women” director’s briefing at “Shanghai Film Art Salon” When talking about the question of the passage. It seems that this view is not limited to Cong Shan, but also a considerable part of the actors jointly hold. In this connection, I would like to take the valuable piece of your magazine to discuss with Cong Shan and other comrades to discuss my point of view. The artist must speak in his work and the performance artist’s work is a complete and vivid artistic image of the stage, the screen and the screen. Yes, many well-known celebrities and performing artists have created a large number of world-recognized artistic images. However, they did not have any great performances to learn about surviving people. They rarely touched ordinary words Theoretical area. From this it seems that we can conclude that we must affirm Comrade Pusan’s point of view, but it is not. The artist’s reflection on his own work is both a summary and the conclusion itself is a distillation of reason. Panshan made a conclusion after she finished filming the Wrangler, talking about her own achievements and shortcomings.