论文部分内容阅读
目的分析剖宫产术后再次妊娠选择的分娩方式和对孕婴影响。方法选择2012年1月~2014年5月我院收治的剖宫产后再次妊娠产妇120例作为研究对象,随机均分为两组,对照组直接采用剖宫产的分娩方式,观察组采用阴道试产的分娩方式,对比两组产妇生产的成功率、术中出血量、住院时间。结果观察组产妇术中出血量及住院时间、产后感染等明显少于对照组。结论产妇有剖宫产史并不能作为再次剖宫产指征,只有产妇没有试产的禁忌,具备试产的条件,以阴道试产完成阴道分娩还是十分有效的,而且安全系数高,减少产妇住院时间,建议临床推广应用。
Objective To analyze the mode of delivery and the influence on pregnancy and infant after the second pregnancy after cesarean section. Methods From January 2012 to May 2014 in our hospital, 120 cases of recurrent pregnant women after cesarean section were randomly divided into two groups. The control group adopted cesarean delivery mode directly, and the observation group adopted vaginal Trial delivery mode of delivery, compared the success rate of maternal production in two groups, intraoperative blood loss, length of stay. Results The observation group maternal intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay, postpartum infection was significantly less than the control group. Conclusion Maternal history of cesarean section and can not be used as an indication of cesarean section again, only the maternal test-producing taboo, with trial production conditions, vaginal trial production of vaginal delivery is still very effective, and the safety factor is high, reduce maternal Hospitalization time, it is recommended clinical application.