论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,学界多以为《(?)杌闲评》的作者是李清。本文认为,《(?)杌闲评》对党争 的描写与李清《三垣笔记》并不一致;《(?)杌闲评》没有特意为李清祖父李思诚辨冤;小说中地 理和方言描写并不能说明作者一定是扬州兴化人;李清的经历、思想、文学主张与《(?)杌闲评》所写有较大差距。这些方面说明李清不可能是《(?)杌闲评》的作者。
For a long time, academics mostly think “(?) Free comment” is the author of Li Qing. This paper argues that “(?) 杌 idle appraisal” on the description of the party struggle and Li Qing “San-yuan notes” are not consistent; “(?) 杌 leisure comment” did not deliberately Li Qingcheng Li Qing prosecution; geography and dialect description It does not mean that the author must be a Xinghua man in Yangzhou. Li Qing’s experiences, ideas and literary ideas have a long way to go. These aspects indicate that Li Qing can not be the author of “(?) Free Comment.”