论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨研究疤痕子宫妊娠的分娩方式及结局，以便给医院针对医院产妇疤痕子宫阴道分娩的手术护理相关工作带来帮助。方法：在医院的产妇中选取阴道分娩的剖宫产术再次妊娠的32例产妇进行阴道试产，这32例产妇作为此次临床观察的观察组，同时选择32例非疤痕子宫产妇进行阴道试产，这32例产妇作为此次临床观察的对照组。比较观察组和对照组中产妇的分娩时的血量、产程时间、新生儿的窒息、apgar评分以及产妇的住院天数。结果：疤痕子宫产妇阴道试产成功28例，试产成功率为87．5％，与非疤痕子宫产妇阴道分娩的成功率相比无显著性差异，p＞0．05，两组产妇在分娩过程中的出血量、产程时间、新生儿窒息率、apgar评分以及住院时间进行比较，无显著性差异，不具有统计学意义，p＞0．05．结论：疤痕子宫产妇再妊娠之后，经阴道分娩与非疤痕子宫阴道分娩没有太大的区别，产妇在条件合适情况下是可以通过阴道进行分娩，安全性还是能够得到保障。“,”Objective :To explore the mode of delivery of uterine scar pregnancy and outcome ,in order to hospital for operation nursing hospital maternal scar uterus vaginal delivery to bring help .Methods :32 cases of maternal vaginal delivery in hospital were selected in the cesarean section pregnancy vaginal trial production ,the 32 cases as the observation group the clinical observation ,while 32 cases non uterine scar maternal vaginal delivery ,32 cases were taken as control group in the clinical observation .Comparative observation of maternal group and control group in the delivery of blood ,hospitalization duration ,Apgar score and neonatal asphyxia ,maternal .Results :the uterine scar maternal vaginal delivery was successful in 28 cases ,the success rate of labor was 87 .5% ,there was no significant difference compared with non scar uterus vaginal delivery success rate ,P > 0 .05 ,the amount of bleeding ,two groups of the parturient labor time ,the rate of neo-natal asphyxia ,Apgar score and duration of hospitalization were compared ,no significant difference ,which was not statistically significant , P > 0 .05 .conclusion :uterine scar pregnancy after women ,vaginal delivery and non scar uterus vaginal delivery is not much difference , women under the right circumstances to make delivery by vagina ,safety or security can be guaranteed .