论文部分内容阅读
争端解决程序是1988年的《南极矿物资源活动管理公约》(以下简称《矿物公约》)得以有效执行的一个重要环节。因为,任何争端若得不到及时和妥善的解决,都会危及公约的有效性,甚至会使南极成为国际纷争的场所和对象。一、南极条约体系有关争端解决的现行规定《南极条约》第11条第1款规定:“如在两个或更多的缔约国之间对本条约的解释或适用发生任何争端,则该缔约各方应彼此协商,以便通过谈判、调查、调停、和解、仲裁、司法解决或其自行选择的其他和平方法解决该争端。”这实际上是重申了《联合国宪章》第33条关于争端解决的规定,并且意味着争端程序的选择取决于当事双方的意愿。但该条比《联合国
Dispute Settlement Procedure is an important part of the effective implementation of the 1988 Convention for the Management of Antarctic Mineral Resources (hereinafter referred to as the “Mineral Convention”). Because any dispute can not be solved promptly and properly, will endanger the validity of the convention, and even make Antarctica become the place and object of international disputes. I. CURRENT PROVISIONS RELATING TO DISPUTE ARISING FROM THE ANTARCTIC TREATY SYSTEM Article 11, paragraph 1, of the Antarctic Treaty provides that: “If there is any dispute between two or more States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Treaty, The parties should negotiate with each other in order to resolve the dispute through negotiation, investigation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement or other peaceful means of its own choosing. ”“ This is in fact a reaffirmation of Article 33 of the UN Charter on dispute settlement , And means that the choice of dispute procedure depends on the wishes of the parties. But the article is better than ”the United Nations."