论文部分内容阅读
公共利益与合理补偿是实现征收权与财产权平衡的两个支点。公益征收的界定包括两个方面:实体法上应以立法规定公益征收的类型为基础,辅之以概括性定义和兜底条款;程序法上应规定公共利益的认定主体和认定程序,通过对个案的司法审查认定。基于“公共利益”的不确定性,为保障效率与公平,应按照协议先行程序优先保护财产权自由,协商购买土地财产权,回避公益征收认定的困惑。同时,应对公益征收进行事后的监督与控制,以防范公益认定的疏漏。
Public interest and reasonable compensation are the two fulcrums to realize the balance between requisition rights and property rights. The definition of public welfare collection includes two aspects: the substantive law should be based on the type of public welfare levied by legislation, supplemented by the general definition and the terms of reference; the procedural law should provide the main body of public interest recognition and recognition of the procedure, Judicial review found. Based on the uncertainty of “public interest ”, in order to ensure the efficiency and fairness, priority should be given to protect the freedom of property rights according to the preemptive procedures of the agreement, negotiate the purchase of land property rights, and avoid confusion over the recognition of public welfare. At the same time, public welfare levied should be subject to supervision and control in case of omission of public interest recognition.