论文部分内容阅读
诺斯在区分渐进的连续变迁和激进的不连续变迁的基础上探讨了制度结构的演进特性,但未能妥善处理正式规则与非正式规则及其实施机制的结合,反而导致了制度变迁的“变迁动力”和“路径依赖”悖论。其后,诺斯又试图将制度变迁置于抽象的共享信念与普遍道德体系的约束之下来消解上述悖论,并将发达的资本主义市场经济和宪政民主制提升到共享信念与普遍道德的地位,但仍未真正消解制度构成要素的内在冲突。以特定的社会物质生活条件和实践活动为起点,坚持“扬弃”的辩证否定观,历史地探讨制度变迁问题,是促进制度构成要素有机协调的必然选择。
North explores the evolving characteristics of the institutional structure on the basis of distinguishing the gradual continuous changes and the radical discontinuous changes. However, the failure to properly handle the combination of the formal rules with the informal rules and their implementation mechanisms leads to the change of “Motivation for change” and “Path dependence” paradox. Later, North attempted to place the institutional change under the restriction of abstract shared beliefs and universal moral system to eliminate the above paradox and elevate the developed capitalist market economy and constitutional democracy to the position of sharing faith and universal morality , But it still has not really resolved the internal conflicts of the elements of the system. Starting from the specific social material living conditions and practical activities, insisting on the dialectical negative outlook of “abandoning ” and historically exploring the issue of institutional change are the inevitable choices for promoting the organic coordination of the system elements.