论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨腹股沟斜疝传统修补术和无张力修补术临床效果。方法：选取我院2001年到2014年收治的100例腹股沟斜疝患者，随机分为观察组和对照组，对照组实行传统修补术，观察组应用无张力修补术，对两组临床效果比较分析。结果：在手术时间、进食时间、住院天数、下床活动时间上，观察组均显著短于对照组，差异具有统计学上的意义（P<0.05）；同时，观察组的并发症率为16%，对照组则为60%，差异也具有统计学上的意义(P<0.01)。结论：在腹股沟斜疝的治疗上，无张力修补术可以取得显著的治疗效果，而且安全性高，应当在临床上推广应用。“,”ObjectiveToinvestigatethe inguinalhernia repair and traditional surgery the clinical effect of tension-free repair.Methods 100 cases of inguinal hernia patients in our hospital from 2001 to 2014 were, were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, the control group with traditional hernioplasty, observation group application of tension free repair, the comparative analysis of the clinical effect of the two groups.Results The operation time, eating time, hospitalization days, time to ambulation, the observation group were significantly shorter than that in the control group, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05); at the same time, the observation group complication rate was 16%, 60% in the control group, the difference is statistically significant (P<0.01).Conclusion In the treatment of inguinal hernia, tension free repair can be achieved significant curative effect, and high safety, should be applied in clinic.