论文部分内容阅读
1956年,拉康在其研讨班上做了《关于〈被窃的信〉的研讨报告》,这不仅是精神分析学中的一个关键时刻,也是文学批评中的重大事件。拉康做这个研讨报告是因为在他看来,这篇小说以一个文学文本的形式绝佳地例证了一个精神分析学的真理,即能指的移置对主体具有构成作用。时隔20年之后,德里达以《真理的供应商》(1975年)向拉康发起咄咄逼人的进攻。德里达不仅反对拉康的基本论题,而且反对拉康关于信/文字的基本性质的每一个观点。在德里达看来,拉康的论述不仅是逻各斯中心主义的,而且是菲勒斯中心主义的。德里达对拉康的指控并非是同一立场上两种主张的斗争,而是两个不同立场之间的斗争。
In 1956, Lacan did a “Symposium on The Stolen Letter” in his seminar, which was not only a crucial moment in psychoanalysis but also a major event in literary criticism. Lacan did this research report because, in his opinion, the novel bestows a psychoanalytic truth in the form of a literary text, in which the signifier’s displacement has a constitutional effect on the subject. After a lapse of 20 years, Derrida launched an aggressive attack on Lacan with The Truth Provider (1975). Derrida not only opposed Lacan’s basic thesis, but also opposed Lacan’s every view on the basic nature of letters / words. In Derrida’s opinion, Lacan’s discourse is not only logocentric but also Philistocentric. Derrida’s accusation of Lacan is not a struggle between the two claims in the same position, but rather a struggle between two different positions.