论文部分内容阅读
塞尔站在语用学的视角上,把语言和人的心理结合起来进行探索,在《什么是言语行为》的意义部分提出了他自己的看法,认为说出一个句子,与完成一种言语行为有区别,具体表现为句子的意义和说话者的意谓这两个特征上。他修正了奥斯汀的言语行为理论,并认为语句意义的研究与言语行为的研究在原则上等同,因此在《什么是言语行为》的意义部分,通过引用格赖斯对“意义”的分析来说明意义既是意向问题,也是惯例问题,言语行为过程中,表达式的使用规则要与表达式产生的效果相联系。但他没有说明做出言语行为过程中体现出的句子的意义和说话者的意谓之间的关系。文章试图通过阐发句子的意义和说话者的意谓之间的关系,探讨如何促进听者领悟说话者意谓。
From the perspective of pragmatics, Searle explores the combination of language and human psychology and puts forward his own opinion in the meaning of “what is verbal behavior”, that is, to say a sentence and to complete a kind of speech There are differences in behavior, the specific performance of the meaning of the sentence and the speaker of the two characteristics. He revised Austin’s theory of speech act and considered that the study of speech meaning and principle of speech act in principle be identical. Therefore, by quoting Grice’s analysis of “meaning ” in the meaning part of “what is speech act” To illustrate the meaning of both the intention of the problem, but also the practice of the problem, the process of speech acts, the expression of the rules of use should be associated with the effect of the expression. But he did not explain the relationship between the meaning of the sentence and the speaker’s meaning embodied in the speech act. The article attempts to explore how to promote the comprehension of the speaker’s meaning by clarifying the relationship between the meaning of the sentence and the speaker’s meaning.