针对自然资源物权,环境法学者相继提出自然资源权益理论、自然资源产权理论、自然资源权属理论等学说,民法的学者也提出了特别法上的物权、准物权等观点。所以,在环境法和民法的相关理论研究中,在自然资源的研究思路上存在明显的差异。这种在研究思路上差异的形成,主要基于学科背景的区别以及理论研究切入点和研究方法的不同,对自然资源物权理论的发展和完善也各自产生了不同的影响。 In view of natural resources real right, scholars of environmental law successively put forward the theory of rights and interests of natural resources, the theory of property rights of natural resources and the theory of ownership of natural resources. The scholars of civil law also put forward the viewpoints of real rights and quasi-real rights in special law. Therefore, there are obvious differences in the research ideas of natural resources in the related theoretical studies of environmental law and civil law. This difference in the formation of research ideas, mainly based on the differences between the academic backgrounds and theoretical research into the different points of entry and research methods, the development and improvement of real rights theory of natural resources have their own different effects.