论文部分内容阅读
刑法理论界所称的刑法解释的目标,是指刑法解释活动最终形成的结论。刑法解释活动最终应当形成什么样的结论,或者说什么样的解释结论才是正当与合理的结论呢?对此,理论界有主观解释论、客观解释论和折中说三种观点。但如前所述,本文认为这些观点实质上也是在阐述刑法解释的规则。文中主要就刑法的解释规则进行了研究,主要研究了刑法解释的介入准则和刑法教案套规则。
Criminal law theory said the purpose of the interpretation of criminal law refers to the ultimate conclusion of criminal law interpretation activities. What conclusion should be formed finally in criminal law interpretation activities, or what kind of explanation conclusion is a just and reasonable conclusion? In this regard, theorists have three kinds of views: subjective interpretation theory, objective interpretation theory and compromise theory. However, as mentioned earlier, this paper argues that these views are essentially also the rules that explain the interpretation of criminal law. This article mainly studies the interpretation rules of criminal law, mainly studies the intervention rules of criminal law interpretation and the rules and regulations of criminal law teaching.