对本刊今年改版后的第一期杂志,读者有些批评和建议。有的意见比较尖锐,如:“刊物好坏不在形式,‘与时俱进’的改版式,最后的去所恐是不祥之地”。时所登文章的择选,也有见仁见智的看法。议论某个改版举动,甚至用了“较蠢”的词儿。然而正如批评者所说,“语不中听,但没有恶意”。当然没有恶意,而且我以为,这完全出于善意。其“善”意在帮助办好刊物,服务好广大读者,善莫大焉!本刊刊载的文章以书评为主,本刊亦在众人评论之列。我们深信:没有创作(者)和评论 The magazine after the revision of this year’s first issue of the magazine, the reader some criticism and suggestions. Some opinions are rather sharp, such as: “publications are not good or bad form, ’advancing with the times,’ the revised version of the last to fear that is ominous.” When the essay articles selected, there are different views. Talk about a revision of the move, and even used the “stupid” word. However, as critics say, “language is not good, but not malicious.” Of course, there is no malice, and I think it is entirely out of goodwill. The “good ” is intended to help run a good publication, good service to readers, good Mo Yan! Articles published in the book review-based, also published in the press commentary. We are convinced that there is no creation and comments