论文部分内容阅读
以客观性证据审查模式,在实践中越来越被重视和运用,这种公诉审查模式和方法在实践中也被基层检察院公诉部门越来越多的采用。传统的口供等言词证据,有一定的局限性,有时为刑事错案埋下了伏笔,这就需要口供与客观性证据相结合,并且特别重视客观性证据的审查与采信。以目前现状而言,立法对客观性证据重视日趋趋势,实务上也越来越重视,同时也是公诉证明标准内在要求,因此,客观性证据审查模式应当作为公诉的基本立场。
With the examination mode of objectivity evidence, more and more attention and application have been made in practice. This mode and method of public prosecution review has also been adopted more and more by public prosecutorial departments of grass-roots procuratorates in practice. The traditional oral and other rhetorical evidence has some limitations and sometimes paves the way for misjudged criminal cases. This requires the combination of oral evidence and objective evidence, and pays special attention to the examination and acceptance of objective evidence. At present, the legislation attaches importance to the growing tendency of objectivity evidence, and also attaches more and more importance to it in practice. At the same time, it is also an inherent requirement of the standard of evidence of prosecution. Therefore, the objective evidence review mode should be the basic position of public prosecution.