信任危机的时代人人自危,情妇成为反贪工作中一大强有力的推手,妻子在法庭上证明丈夫有罪,此举在提高司法效率的同时是否也符合价值理性的考量是值得反思的问题。本文从法学、社会学、心理学等角度论证了“近亲属不被强制出庭作证”条款的合理性,并建议强化该思想,赋予近亲属在特定案件中的拒绝作证权,使法治的篇章亦闪耀着人性的光芒。 In times of crisis of confidence, everybody is at risk. The mistress becomes a powerful promoter of anti-corruption work. His wife proved guilty of being a husband in court. Is it worthwhile to reconsider whether the act is justified in the sense of value while improving judicial efficiency? . This article demonstrates the rationality of the clause that “close relatives are not compelled to testify in court” from the perspectives of law, sociology and psychology, and proposes to strengthen the idea and give the near relatives the right to refuse to testify in certain cases so that the rule of law Chapter also shines the light of humanity.