论文部分内容阅读
本文以乐清低压电器集群、徐州工程机械集群和苏州笔记本电脑集群三大核型集群为例,对其共性问题以及这些问题在各集群中的差异化表现进行对比分析,得出结论:三大产业集群中,焦点企业核心地位源于其对具备较高复杂程度的最终产品的掌控,而各集群最终产品复杂程度上的差异决定其内部焦点企业数量与发展态势;各集群多网络演化过程起点因焦点企业初期实力强弱而不同,但创新网络都是其演化的高级阶段;三大产业集群都有完整程度极高的零部件配套体系,这是焦点企业组件技术群外获取与群内剥离的结果;各集群中小企业的发展停滞源于其无法获取具备一定技术成长空间的关键组件技术。基于上述分析,作者就此类集群所在地政府工作给出了具体建议。
This paper takes Yueqing low-voltage electrical cluster, Xuzhou construction machinery cluster and Suzhou notebook cluster as an example, compares and analyzes the common problems and the differentiated performance of these problems in each cluster, and concludes that the three major industries Cluster, the core of the focus of the enterprise from its control of the final product with a higher degree of complexity, and the final product complexity of each cluster determines the number of its focus on the number of enterprises and the development trend of each cluster network evolution process starting point Focus strength and strength of the initial strength of the company is different, but the innovation network is its advanced stage of evolution; the three major industrial clusters have a very high degree of complete parts supporting system, which is the focus of enterprise technology components outside the group and group stripping As a result, the development of small and medium-sized enterprises in each cluster is stagnant because of its inability to acquire key component technologies with certain technological growth potential. Based on the above analysis, the author gives specific suggestions on the government work where such clusters are located.