论文部分内容阅读
自从元伦理学以来,事实与价值的区分被认为是价值概念的基础。以“是”为述词的判断形式和以“应当”为述词的判断形式是根本不同的,前者是事实判断,后者是价值判断。当代哲学的这一认识来源于休谟。但休谟是在一种道德文化转换背景下意识到这种区分的,当现代哲学家把它看成是价值研究的基本前提时,就取消了价值存在的本体,从而把价值看成是对主体自身态度的表达。新自然主义提出区分自然事实与社会事实,认为价值与社会事实内在相关,我们认为,新自然主义的这一认识揭示了价值的源泉。
Since meta-ethics, the distinction between facts and values has been considered as the basis of the concept of value. The judgment form of “yes” is fundamentally different from the judgment form of “should”, the former is fact judgment and the latter is value judgments. This understanding of contemporary philosophy comes from Hume. However, Hume realized this kind of distinction in the context of a moral and cultural change. When the modern philosopher regarded it as the basic premise of value research, he canceled the noumenon of value existence, Attitude expression. Neo-naturalism proposes to distinguish between natural and social facts, believing that values are inherently related to social facts, and we believe that this new naturalistic understanding reveals the source of value.