论文部分内容阅读
涉外民事裁判中法官阐明并证立其法律选择的理由是现代社会赋予法官的一项基本义务,也是我国司法改革的一项重要内容。在涉外民事裁判中,法律选择证立的目的在于通过论证法律选择的合法性、合理性、客观性和融贯性来正当化其法律选择行为。在具体的法律选择证立中,法官应就案件事实与冲突规范的相适应、定性以及冲突规范的解释问题展开证立。形式、实质和程序是评价法官具体法律选择证立质量的三个向度。
The reasons why judges clarify and establish their legal choices in foreign civil judgments are a basic obligation given to judges in modern society and an important content of judicial reform in our country. In foreign civil judgment, the purpose of legal choice is to legitimize its legal choice behavior by demonstrating the legitimacy, rationality, objectivity and coherence of legal choice. In the concrete legal choice, the judge should establish the conformity and the nature of the facts of the case and the interpretation of the conflict norms. Form, substance and procedure are three dimensions to evaluate the quality of judge’s legal choice.