因《汉书.艺文志》名家载《公孙龙子》,而《隋书.经籍志》未载,故清人姚际恒疑其伪书,进而《公孙龙子》中的《白马论》亦成伪书。自此之后,学界多有争论。黄云眉提出进一步论据支持姚说,然而更多的学者论证《白马论》为真书。本文评述了双方所给出的主要论据,并指出现有之论据尚不足以鉴定《白马论》之真伪。 Due to “Han Shu Yi Wen Zhi” famous “Gongsun Long Zi”, and “Sui Shu. Ji Zhi Zhi” is not contained, so the Qing Yao Yao suspect its pseudo-book, and then “Gongsun Long Zi” in the “white horse” also into a false book. Since then, many controversies in the academic community. Huang Yunmei put forward further arguments to support Yao said, however, more scholars argued that “White Horse Theory” is a real book. This article reviews the main arguments given by both parties and points out that the existing arguments are not sufficient to identify the authenticity of “White Horse Theory.”