当前,法律对认定职务犯罪案件侦查行为是否构成“疲劳审讯”的标准不甚明确,造成刑事诉讼各方参与人经常会在此问题上出现观点冲突。对此,本文认为可以在借鉴国外有关规定的基础上,理清疲劳审讯与保障嫌疑人必要的休息时间、“痛苦规则”之间的关系,为职务犯罪案件“疲劳审讯”认定标准提出建议。 At present, the law is not clear about whether the investigation of finding a job-related criminal offense constitutes a “fatigue trial”, which often leads to conflicting opinions on this issue among participants in criminal proceedings. In this regard, this paper believes that we can draw lessons from the relevant provisions of foreign countries, to clarify the trial of fatigue and suspects the necessary time to rest, “the relationship between painful rules” for the duty crime “fatigue trial ” identified Standards make recommendations.