1922年和1937年,汪馥泉和陆侃如、储皖峰、罗根泽分别发起组织“中国文学史研究会”。汪馥泉提出具体的分工合作计划,并且得到郑振铎、沈雁冰、陈望道、曹聚仁等人的回应,但因观念差异、介入文学研究会和创造社论争引起双方不满、势单力薄等原因,最后无疾而终。陆侃如、储皖峰、罗根泽三人虽然志同道合、术业专攻,但在筹划之中被抗战阻遏。这两次“合作运动”既是民国以来现代学术研究日益精细的驱动,也是对当时中国文学史粗制滥造不满的表达。 In 1922 and 1937, Wang Fuquan and Lu Kanru, Chu Wanfeng, Luo Genze were sponsored organizations “history of Chinese literature will ”. Wang Fuquan proposed a specific plan of division of labor and cooperation and was echoed by Zheng Zhenduo, Shen Yanbing, Chen Wangdao, Cao Juren and others. However, due to differences in perceptions, involvement in literary research meetings and the creation of editorial controversy, the two sides were dissatisfied with the situation and were faced with the slightest disagreement. Lu Kanru, Chu Wanfeng, Luo Genze although like-minded, professional surgery, but in the planning of the war was deterred. These two “cooperative movements” are not only driven by the increasingly fine modern academic research since the Republic of China, but also the expression of the unbridled resentment of the history of Chinese literature.