论文部分内容阅读
[目的]探讨单独使用周期性充气加压装置应用于下肢深静脉血栓的疗效。[方法]对比研究2000年12月~2007年8月对52例骨科下肢深静脉血栓患者在溶栓或介入接触性溶栓术后用与不用周期性充气加压的疗效。病人分两组:第1组(32例)溶栓或导管介入接触性溶栓术后常规使用低分子肝素及华法林;第2组(20例)在第1组的基础上加用周期性充气加压,对比两组中需追加溶栓例数、症状开始缓解时间、第7 d肿胀消退程度及1个月后病变段静脉再通程度。[结果]第1组有3例需追加溶栓,第2组没有需追加溶栓者;第2组症状缓解快、肿胀消退明显、病变段静脉再通程度高。[结论]周期性充气加压在深静脉血栓的综合治疗中能发挥良好的效果。
[Objective] To investigate the curative effect of periodic pneumatic compression device applied to lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. [Method] A comparative study of 52 patients with deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities between December 2000 and August 2007 after thrombolysis or interventional contact thrombolysis with or without periodic inflation was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (32 cases) routinely used low molecular weight heparin and warfarin after thrombolysis or catheter interventional contact thrombolysis; Group 2 (20 cases) Inflatable compression, compared with the need for additional thrombolysis cases in both groups, symptoms began to ease the time, 7 d swelling extent of regression and 1 month after the lesion venous recanalization. [Results] In group 1, 3 patients needed additional thrombolysis and no need for additional thrombolysis in group 2. The symptoms in group 2 were relieved quickly and the swelling subsided obviously. [Conclusion] Periodic inflation can play a good role in the comprehensive treatment of deep vein thrombosis.