论文部分内容阅读
一、问题的提出:案件数量作为启动宪法解释的技术障碍关于全国人大常委会解释宪法的程序,我国宪法并没有具体规定。2000年颁布实施的立法法第90条、第91条对全国人大常委审查与宪法相抵触的行政法规、地方性法规、自治条例和单行条例的程序进行了规定。但是,立法法实施至今,全国人大常委会并未依据此程序进行过违宪审查,其中的原因是多方面的,学界和实务界对此多有探讨。但是,在笔者看来,有一个技术性因素却一直被忽略了,这个因素就是:宪法案件的数量。
First, the issue put forward: the number of cases as a technical impediment to start the interpretation of the Constitution On the NPC Standing Committee to explain the constitutional process, our country’s constitution does not have specific provisions. Article 90 of the Legislation Law enacted in 2000 promulgated and Article 91 stipulates the procedures for the NPCSC to examine the administrative regulations, local laws and regulations, self-government ordinances and individual bankrupt regulations that contravene the Constitution. However, since the implementation of the Legislation Law, the NPC Standing Committee did not conduct any constitutional review on the basis of this procedure. The reasons for this are many. There are many discussions between the academic circles and practitioners. However, in my opinion, there is one technical factor that has been neglected. This factor is the number of constitutional cases.