酿成一篇好影评,不是一件简单容易的事情。电影很富有社会性,影评应充分注意到这一点,使其自身也富:有社会性。这就提出了高要求:光读杜甫仁科,爱森斯坦是不够的。影评者自己对人生、对社会有无认真而又慎独的思考,是否充满蓬勃向上的热情,倒是至关重要的。影评与电影一样,都是作者生活、感情和思想(当然还有文化修养等)在社会和读者面前的呈示。不在人生观、社会观这些根本点上下功夫、多锤炼,影评不可能高,不可能深,也不可能新,因此,我以为影评的“功夫在 It’s not easy or simple to make a good movie review. Films are socially rich, film critics should be fully aware of this, to make itself rich: social. This raises the high demand that it would not be enough to read Duffy Renke and Eisenstein. Film critics of their own life, the community have serious and cautious thinking, is full of vigorous enthusiasm, it touches crucial. Like movies, film criticism is the presentation of the author’s life, feelings and thoughts (and of course, cultural accomplishments, etc.) in front of society and readers. Not in the outlook on life, social outlook these basic points make efforts, more temper, film criticism can not be high, can not be deep, it is impossible new, so I think the film’s "Kung Fu