论文部分内容阅读
常州宏达仪表厂（武进宏达仪表厂）法人代表梅介明1998年与本刊签订广告合同,本刊按合同规定发布广告,但宏达仪表厂却不能按合同规定付清所欠广告款。宏达仪表厂梅介明厂长于1999年10月与本刊签订还款协议,2000年初全部还清欠款。到现在,已历时三年,本刊数十次电话、传真、信件和派人去催款,只要宏达仪表厂梅介明厂长每月付250,21个月就可付清欠款,但宏达仪表厂梅介明厂长始终不履行还款协议。本刊只好根据协议规定,在本刊对宏达仪表厂公开催款。 欠债还债,理之常情。从宏达仪表厂和梅介明厂长不讲诚信的事实中,用户对此会自然想到:“宏达仪表厂和梅介
Changzhou Hongda Instrument Factory (Wujin Hongda Instrument Factory) legal representative Mei Jieming signed an advertising contract with the journal in 1998. This publication publishes advertisements according to the contract, but HTC can’t pay off the advertising money owed according to the contract. . Hongda Instrument Factory director Mei Jieming signed a repayment agreement with the journal in October 1999. In early 2000, it paid off all debts. Up till now, this journal has lasted three years. The Journal has sent dozens of telephone calls, faxes, letters and sent people to collect funds. As long as the factory director of Hongda Instrument Factory, Mr. Mei Jieming, pays 250,21 months each month, he can pay off the money. However, the director of Hongda Instrument Factory Mei Jieming has not fulfilled the repayment agreement. According to the provisions of the agreement, this publication has published a dunning payment for Hongda Instrument Factory in this publication. Debt to pay debts, justified. From the fact that Hongda Instrument Factory and Mei Jieming’s factory manager do not speak honesty, the user will naturally think of this: "Honda Instrument Factory and Meisuke