论文部分内容阅读
目的:通过甲胎蛋白测定法与传统高危评分法对高危妊娠筛查的临床效果进行比较探讨高危筛查的新途径。方法:对5年间在门诊建立孕妇保健手册的孕妇进行甲胎蛋白测定,同时按传统评分法进行高危评分,分别进行高危筛出率的统计并进行对比分析。结果:甲胎蛋白测定法高危筛出率明显高于高危评分法(P<0.01)。结论:两种筛查方法有明显的互补作用,适用基层保健机构推广使用。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effects of screening high-risk pregnancies with alpha-fetoprotein and traditional high-risk scoring methods to explore new ways of screening for high-risk patients. Methods: Pregnant women who set up the manual of pregnant women’s health during the five years were tested for alpha-fetoprotein. At the same time, the high-risk scores were scored according to the traditional method. The high-risk screening rates were calculated and compared. Results: The high-risk screening rate of alpha-fetoprotein was significantly higher than that of high-risk score (P <0.01). Conclusion: The two screening methods have obvious complementary effects, suitable for promotion and use of primary health care institutions.