论文部分内容阅读
根据我国刑法的明文规定和从应用的实际效果出发,紧急避险制度仍存在一些有争议的地方,紧急避险的必要限度问题存在轻于说、必要说、法益权衡说、轻于加必要说等几种观点,生命对生命能否紧急避险的问题上存在肯定说、否定说和条件说,对于职务上、业务上负有特定责任的人能否紧急避险也存在肯定说和否定说两种观点,本文就以上问题进行了探讨,以期待我国的紧急避险制度更加完善。
According to the express provisions of our criminal law and from the practical effect of application, there are still some controversial places in the system of emergency hedging. The necessary limits of emergency hedging are less than speaking. It is necessary to say that the law and the tradeoff should be weighed, And other views, there is a certainty on the issue of whether life can emerge as an emergent hedge. According to the theory of denial and condition, affirmative or negative affirmation can be given to those who have a specific responsibility in their duties and in business. From two perspectives, this paper discusses the above problems in order to expect the perfect emergency avoidance system in our country.