论文部分内容阅读
在现存清代的戏曲史料中,我们已知的有关西皮腔渊源的史料实际仅有两种。一种是福建人张际亮道光八年(1828年)作于京师(今北京)的《金台残泪记》中“谓甘肃腔曰西皮调”的说法;另一种是中国艺术研究院戏曲研究所资料室收藏的清抄本《梅玉配》中一段名为“西皮”的唱腔工尺谱。张际亮《金台残泪记》中的上述说法,是论者在谈到西皮腔的渊源时经常引用的史料。它一般被看作西皮腔源于西秦腔的重要根据。但这一说法的
In the extant drama historical materials in the Qing Dynasty, there are only two kinds of historical materials we know about the origin of the Xipi cavity. One is the Fujian people Zhang Ji-liang Daoguang eight years (1828) in the capital (now Beijing) “Golden Tear of Tears” in the “said Gansu cavity tone”; the other is the Chinese Academy of Arts Opera Institute data room collection of the Qing Ban “Mei Yu with” in the paragraph called “Xipi ” singing chamber staff spectrum. Zhang Jiliang “Jintai residual tears in mind,” the above argument, is the argument when talking about the origin of the cicada cavity often cited historical data. It is generally regarded as an important basis for the origin of the Xipi cavity. But this statement