论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨DR图像软阅读在新生儿肺炎诊断中应用价值。方法:对142例新生儿肺炎病例的影像学资料进行回顾性分析,比较两种读片方式对诊断新生儿肺炎的差异。结果:在支气管肺炎软阅读与灯箱阅读的正确率分别为100.0%和88.4%,在间质性肺炎软阅读与灯箱阅读的正确率分别为100.0%和57.1%,在大灶性肺炎软阅读与灯箱阅读的正确率分别为100.0%和54.2%,在大叶性肺炎软阅读与灯箱阅读的正确率分别为100.0%和30.0%。工作站软阅读和灯箱阅读在新生儿间质性肺炎及大叶性肺炎的诊断中差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:DR工作站软阅读对诊断新生儿间质性肺炎及大叶性肺炎具有重要的诊断价值。
Objective: To explore the value of DR image soft reading in the diagnosis of neonatal pneumonia. Methods: The imaging data of 142 cases of neonatal pneumonia were retrospectively analyzed. The differences between the two methods in diagnosing neonatal pneumonia were compared. Results: The correct rates of soft reading and light box reading in bronchopneumonia were 100.0% and 88.4%, respectively. The correct rates of soft reading and light box reading in interstitial pneumonia were 100.0% and 57.1%, respectively. The correct rates of reading were 100.0% and 54.2%, respectively, and the correct reading rates of reading and light box in lobar pneumonia were 100.0% and 30.0% respectively. The differences between workstation soft reading and light box reading in the diagnosis of neonatal interstitial pneumonia and lobar pneumonia were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The soft reading of DR workstation has important diagnostic value in diagnosing neonatal interstitial pneumonia and lobar pneumonia.