论文部分内容阅读
论文作者在提倡PACL之前有过在日本起草民法时效法改正整备草案的经验,PACL的作业方法对上述经验进行了借鉴。论文分析了PACL研究上一些尚未解决的问题和今后需要继续研究讨论的课题。此外,从比较法学或法律文化论的视角来看,作者认为在PACL上几乎没有反映着“亚洲的特色”的规定,并通过追溯日本近代化的过程尝试探讨其理由。
The author of this paper has had experience in drafting the civil law reform in Japan before he advocated PACL. PACL’s method of operation has drawn lessons from these experiences. The thesis analyzes some unresolved problems in PACL research and the topics that need to be further studied and discussed in the future. In addition, from the perspective of comparative jurisprudence or legal culture, the author thinks that there is almost no reflection of the “Asian Characteristics” in the PACL, and tries to explore the reason by tracing Japan’s modernization process.