论文部分内容阅读
基于行业上游度测算的视角,利用WIOD的国家投入产出表,对1995—2011年中日两国的全球价值链上的分工地位展开系统的测算及比较分析。研究表明:在本文的考察期内,中国整体和细分行业基本位于全球价值链的相对上游环节,并存在进一步向全球价值链的中间投入端转移的趋势;日本整体和细分行业基本表现出向全球价值链的最终使用端靠拢的趋向。基于偏离-份额分析法的分解结果显示,在2003年以前,行业间效应是导致中国向全球价值链下游环节转移的主要动因,在此之后,行业内效应则成为中国向全球价值链上游环节移动的主导因素;但在推动日本转向价值链下游环节的过程中,行业间和行业内效应发挥着近乎同等作用。
Based on the perspective of industrial upstream degree estimation, we use WIOD’s country input-output table to make a systematic measurement and comparative analysis of the division of labor between China and Japan in the global value chain in 1995-2011. The research shows that in the period of this article, China’s overall and sub-sectors are basically located in the relatively upstream part of the global value chain, and there is a tendency to shift further toward the intermediate inputs of the global value chain. The overall and sub-sectors in Japan basically show a trend toward The end-use trend of global value chains is moving closer. The decomposition result based on deviation-share analysis shows that before 2003, interindustry effect was the main reason for the shift of China to the global value chain, and then the intra-industry effect was the result of China’s move to the upstream of the global value chain However, in promoting Japan’s shift to the lower part of the value chain, inter-industry and intra-industry effects play an almost equal role.