在《孔子家語》中,關於孔子弟子的集中記載,除了《七十二弟子解》,還有《弟子行》一篇。前者與《史記·仲尼弟子列傳》相仿佛,長期以來,由於對《孔子家語》成書問題的錯誤認識,人們研究孔門弟子遂多以《史記》爲本,而對《家語》該篇少有問津;後者與《大戴禮記》的《衛將軍文子》篇相同,只是個别文字上有小的差異。但《大戴禮記》與《史記》不同,人們對《史記》研究較多,而對於《大戴禮記》的價值則多存疑慮,再 In “Confucius”, the concentrated records of Confucius’ disciples, apart from “Seventy-two Disciples” and “Disciples”. The former is similar to “Biographies of Shi Zhong and Nehemiah”. For a long time, due to the misunderstanding of the problem of writing “Confucius”, people study Confucius’ The article is of little interest; the latter is the same as the “Dai General Li Wenzi,” “General Wen Zi” articles, but individual differences in text. However, “Da Dai Li Ji” is different from “Shi Ji”, people study more about “Shi Ji” and more doubt about the value of Da Dai Li Ji