论文部分内容阅读
诉讼主体中,一方是在澳门公司中赫赫有名的娱乐公司,法人代表何鸿燊;一方是上海最大的民营企业,法人代表桂爱珍;为债务纠纷走上法院——两虎争斗,鹿死谁手? 为解决纠纷,双方组织了强大的律师班子,原告为解决此案,联系了十几家律师事务所,参与该案的律师分别来自北京、上海、香港和美国——胜败未定,先声夺人！ 一审受理机关即在上海高级人民法院,可见案件重大,新闻媒体不失时机界入、炒作,角度各异,上海市委宣传部一纸“禁止令”,一切平息了许多; 庭前花絮频出,庭上互不相让,庭后未见波澜;
Among the litigants, one is the well-known entertainment company and legal representative of Hong Kong Stanley Ho; one is Shanghai’s largest private-owned enterprise and legal representative, Gui Aizhen; the one who takes the court to fight for the debt dispute - In the dispute, the two sides organized a strong team of lawyers. In order to solve the case, the plaintiff contacted more than a dozen law firms. The lawyers participating in the case came from Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong and the United States respectively. The court of first instance accepted the case that in the Shanghai Higher People’s Court, the major cases were seen. The news media did not lose any time in terms of time, speculation and perspective. Shanghai Municipal Party Committee Propaganda Department issued a “Prohibition Order,” a lot of which had subsided. Reciprocal, no waves after the court;