论文部分内容阅读
在肿瘤研究中,众多实验室可能进行着目的相同的实验,但各实验室在实验设计、对象选择、样本含量、指标设定、统计方法等方面会有所不同,导致了最终结果上的差异。面对数量巨大的文献信息,综述对于人们快速获得本专业研究进展和最新信息有重要的参考价值。传统的文献综述大多是对某一问题的笼统概述,无法提供定量结果,对有关同一类问题的多个报道采用平等(等权重方法)对待方式,得出的综合结论存在一定的主观性、片面性。
In cancer research, many laboratories may carry out the same purpose of the experiment, but each laboratory in the experimental design, object selection, sample size, set the indicators, statistical methods, etc. will be different, resulting in the final difference . The face of a huge number of literature information, review for people quickly access to the professional research and the latest information has important reference value. Most of the traditional literature reviews are a general overview of a problem, failing to provide quantitative results, and applying equal (equal weight method) treatment to multiple reports on the same type of issues. The comprehensive conclusions obtained have some subjectivity and one-sidedness .