述职应述“实”

来源 :中国公路 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:gelsy1982
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
又到年终,各地都要对干部进行考评。作为其中一项重要内容是干部述职,让他们对自己一个阶段的工作进行总结汇报,通过述职报告让组织和群众了解述职人的成绩太小、工作情况,并以此来确定工作实绩的优劣、升降去留。然而,不知出于何种原因,实际生活中述职不述“实”的现象并不鲜见。有些干部总在述职报告上做文章,对成绩夸大其词,滔滔不绝;对缺点和不足之处玩文字游戏,搞“模糊法”:“某些方面做得不够好,思想不够解放,工作不够大胆”等精心设计的述职“词汇”常见诸报告,为自己工作中的缺点、错误打“埋伏”。如此文过饰非,实在不利于干部改正缺点 By the end of the year, cadres must be assessed everywhere. As one of the important contents, cadres report to the workforce so that they can summarize and report on their work in one phase. Through the debriefing report, the organization and the masses can understand the achievements and weaknesses of job descriptions and performance of employees and determine the merits and demerits of job performance. , Lift to stay. However, for some reason, it is not uncommon to find that “real” situations are not described in real life. Some cadres always make a fuss about the debriefing report, and exaggerate their accomplishments. They do not hesitate to play word games against shortcomings and shortcomings. They engage in “fuzzy methods”: “Some are not doing well enough, their thoughts are not enough liberated, Work is not bold enough ”and other well-designed job description “ vocabulary ”common reports, for the shortcomings of their work, wrong call “ ambush ”. It is really detrimental to cadres to correct shortcomings
其他文献
海城市人事局在全市率先实行公务员竞争上岗制度,对中层干部的选配采用了公开报名,民主评选,组织决定的方式;对科员的选配实行双向选择,组织决定的方式,公正合理地选配了各