《新闻战线》杂志第四期发表庹震写的《“鼻子”和“绳子”——浅议“三包采访”》,我看了很有同感,值得开展一次讨论。“三包采访”、“组团采访”,依我看,只要倡导者出以公心,管理者有章有法,执行者品德良好,一般说总是利大于弊的。倡导者和新闻单位都节约了时间、节省了精力,无形中也会在参加活动的新闻从业人员中间引起一番激烈竞争,在一定程度上也是检验记者“道行”高低强弱的竞技场。倡导者自愿从物质方面提供一点儿资助行不行? 笔者的回答是:“愿者上钩。”这是因为:一方面,这种采访方式、方法,同我 “Nose” and “Rope” written by Zuo Zhen in the fourth issue of “News Front” magazine - On the “Three Guarantees Interview,” I saw a lot of sympathy and deserved a discussion. “Three Guarantees Interview,” and “Delegation Interview.” In my opinion, as long as the advocates outspoken, the managers have the rules and regulations, and the practitioners are well-behaved, they are generally said to outweigh the disadvantages. Advocates and press agencies have saved time and energy and virtually caused fierce competition among news practitioners who participated in the activities. To a certain extent, this is also an arena for testing the strength of journalists on the “Taoism” line. Advocates voluntarily offer a little subsidy from the material side okay? The author’s answer is: “The petitioner is the bait.” This is because: on the one hand, this interview method, method,