论文部分内容阅读
保证与物的担保之间的关系历来都是各路法学学者竞相争论的焦点。保证与物的担保并存时,各国的立法模式即有保证人绝对优待主义、保证人相对优待主义、平等主义之分。笔者以比较法之视野分析主要大陆法系国家对保证与物上担保竞存的适用规则之态度,并在梳理我国现行相关规则的基础上,对此问题作较为全面的分析与探讨,并提出具体之适用规则。
The relationship between guarantee and material guarantee has always been the focus of debate among legal scholars in various fields. When the guarantees and the co-existence of the guarantees exist, the legislative modes of all countries have the absolute preferential treatment of sponsors and the guarantee of relative preferential treatment and egalitarianism. Based on the comparative law, the author analyzes the attitude of applicable countries in major civil law countries on the applicable rules of security and material security deposit. On the basis of combing with the existing relevant rules in our country, the author makes a more comprehensive analysis and discussion on this issue and puts forward Specific applicable rules.