性政治作为一个性别对另一个性别的支配和统治是无处不在的,凯特·米利特在《性政治》一书中从八个方面界定了男性对女性的统治方式,梳理了性革命及其反动的历史,并分析了几位男性作家如何通过文学作品建构性别压迫。“性政治”这一概念有着后现代的解构特征,揭示了男权制度建构的性别神话的不合理之处,因此富于战斗性,但在制度层面的平等已经基本实现之后,改变存在于精神结构中的更为隐蔽的不平等这一目标更为艰难,无论是激进的还是温和的方式,都有各自的不足和积极意义。最后,对抗式的阅读方式也并不是唯一的,女性可以通过积极利用现有的文化资源进行意义生产,表达自身的欲望。总之,在米利特的对抗和颠覆的革命姿态之外,渐进和协商的方式,也是女性主义实现最终目标的有效选择。 Sex politics as a single gender domination and domination of other genders is ubiquitous, Kate Milita in the “Sexual Politics,” a book from eight aspects of male domination of women, combing the sexual revolution and its Reactionary history, and analyzed how several male writers constructed the gender oppression through literary works. The concept of “sexual politics” possesses the postmodern deconstruction feature and reveals the irrationality of gender myths in the construction of the patriarchal system. Therefore, it is full of combat effectiveness. However, after the equality at the institutional level has been basically achieved, it changes its existence The goal of a more subtle inequality in the spiritual structure is more difficult, both radically and modestly, with its own inadequacies and positive implications. Finally, adversarial reading is not the only one, and women can express their own desires by actively using existing cultural resources for meaningful production. In short, beyond Millit’s revolutionary gesture of confrontation and subversion, the gradual and consultative approach is also an effective choice for feminism to achieve its ultimate goal.