论文部分内容阅读
近现代刑法学的发展史是一部苦苦追寻贯通犯罪与刑罚合理联系的探寻史,行为主义刑法学派、行为人主义刑法学派、人格主义刑法学派的界说均存在着或多或少的问题。在静止的犯罪与变化的刑罚之间,必然有一个呈时空变化状的因素方能将二者合理贯通始终,该任务的完成者不是静止着的客观罪行,也不是静止着的主观罪过,更不是隶属于心理学概念上的虚无缥缈的人格态度,以对社会化的维持及其良性发展的蔑视与对抗态度作为自身内核的主观恶性成为当仁不让的中介载体。这个主观恶性坚持由行为作为其征表的可靠载体,犯罪行为成为其进入刑法学评价范围的绝对牵引力,而罪前、罪后可以表明犯罪人主观恶性轻重程度的因素也依附于主观恶性进入刑法学的评价范围。
The history of the development of modern criminal law is a search history that painstakingly searches for a reasonable connection between crime and punishment. There are more or less problems in the theories of behaviorist criminal law school, behaviorist criminal law school and personality school criminal law school . Between a still crime and a change of penalty, there must be a factor that is in a state of temporal and spatial change so that the two can be rationally linked from beginning to end. The completion of the task is not a static objective crime nor a static subjective sin. Not subordinate to the concept of psychology on the nihilistic attitude of personality, in order to socialize the maintenance of its benign development and contempt and antagonism as the subjective viciousness of its own kernel as the carrier of doing my part. This subjective viciousness insists on behavior as the reliable carrier of its expropriation, and criminal activity becomes its absolute traction into the evaluation range of criminal jurisprudence. The factors that can indicate the severity of the subjective viciousness before crime and after crime also depend on the subjective viciousness entering the criminal law The scope of learning.