晚清政府关于外国教会在华持有武装政策述论

来源 :安徽史学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:timhero
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
关于外国教会在华持有武装问题 ,晚清政府实行的是有限禁止政策。这种政策由不同层次的基本政策和具体政策构成。造成这种政策的表面原因是《大清律例》自身的法律弹性和近代中外大局下的政教互动关系 ,根本原因还是晚清时期国力孱弱 ,政府无能。实施这种政策的目的是为了实现社会控制、维持中外相安、借用先进技术三个方面。该政策从 1 85 3年起步 ,至 1 90 8年成形 ,实施到 1 91 2年清政府灭亡结束。其中 ,以 1 90 1年为界 ,分为前后两个阶段。两阶段相比较 ,政策呈现出类型由简单而丰富、内容由粗疏而详明、执行由松弛而严格的三大特征。 As for the foreign churches holding armed issues in China, the late Qing government imposed a limited ban policy. This kind of policy consists of different levels of basic policies and specific policies. The superficial reason for this policy is the legal flexibility of the “Qing Law” itself and the interaction between church and state under the overall situation of both China and foreign countries. The fundamental reason is that the state power was weak and the government was incompetent in the late Qing period. The purpose of implementing such a policy is to achieve social control, maintain peace both at home and abroad, and borrow advanced technologies from three aspects. The policy started in 1883 and was shaped in 1908, ending the demise of the Qing government in 1912. Among them, with 1990 as the boundary, divided into two stages before and after. Compared with the two stages, the policy shows three types of features: simple and rich in content, coarse and detailed in content, and loose and strict in implementation.
其他文献
“六经皆史”说井非章学诚始倡,却被他特别强调,是他学术理论中的重要命题。本文认为,章氏“六经皆史”说并非贬损经的地位,相反,而是借重史学“道不离器”的传统,矫正心学的积弊,恢
吴汝纶的医药观,明显地表现为对西医西药的笃信、热衷乃至迷信,对中医中药的非信、排拒乃至诋毁,呈极端化、绝对化、情绪化的偏执。这既是构成他中西文化观的一个侧面,又与他
192 8年底 ,南京国民政府虽然建立了一个全国性的政权 ,但实际上并没有真正统一全国。特别是僻处边塞的新疆 ,并不在国民政府的实际控制范围内。随着西北特别是新疆在全国的
本文通过论述太平天国战争对安徽田赋征收的影响 ,揭示了安徽传统社会向近代转型前的内部危机。文章分四节 :一、太平天国战争对安徽旧秩序的摧毁性打击 ;二、安徽田赋征收的