制度建设是反腐败的根本性举措。从国外一些长期执政政党制度反腐的经验来看,首先是注重制度的规范性和系统性建设,其次是重视制度的执行力,对腐败实行零容忍,最后注重加强内外约束机制的构建,使政党时刻处于监督之中。而有些长期执政的政党,由于缺乏有效的制度反腐措施,腐败泛滥,积重难返,最终丧失政权。例如,苏共长期缺乏有效的监督制约机制,形成特权和腐败的制度化,最终被人民抛弃;印度国大党实行家族式统治,导致垄断和官僚主义及权力寻租的蔓延,最终失去选票;日本自民党“金权政治”泛滥,失去民众信任,等等。执政党治理腐败 Institutional building is a fundamental measure against corruption. From the experiences of anti-corruption of some long-standing ruling party systems in foreign countries, the first thing is to pay attention to the normative and systematic construction of the system. The second is to attach importance to the execution of the system and to impose zero tolerance on corruption. Finally, the emphasis is placed on strengthening the construction of internal and external restraint mechanisms so that political parties Time is under supervision. However, some long-term political parties have lost their power because of the lack of an effective anti-corruption system and the proliferation of corruption. For example, the long absence of an effective system of oversight and restraint in the Soviet Communist Party led to institutionalization of privileges and corruption and its abandonment by the people. The implementation of the clan rule by the Indian Congress led to the spread of monopoly and bureaucracy and rent-seeking of power, which eventually resulted in the loss of votes. Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party “Golden Power Politics ” flooding, losing public trust, and so on. Ruling party governs corruption