《闭宫》乃三百篇中之第一长篇 ,而对其作者问题却历来众说纷纭。历来争执的焦点 ,皆聚集于篇末的“奚斯所作”这一句 :或以为作诗 ,或以为作庙。本文围绕“奚斯所作”句及其上下文 ,从文例及文法两个方面展开了考辨 ,爬梳剔剖 ,不泥不妄 ,最终得出了“奚斯所作”者是庙而不是诗的结论。 “Closed Palace” is the first of three hundred articles, but its author has always been divided on different issues. Has always been the focus of dispute, are gathered in the end of the “Xi Si made” this sentence: either as a poem, or as a temple. This essay focuses on the “Xi Si” sentences and their contexts, from the textual and grammatical aspects of two aspects of textual criticism, combing anatomy, is not trivial, concludes that “Xi Si made” is the temple rather than poetry in conclusion.