裁量基准是近年来兴起的一种对行政处罚自由裁量权进行控制的方式,通过对裁量范围进行细化,可以为执法提供具体明确的标准,从而遏制对自由裁量权的滥用。但是,目前在裁量基准的制定中还存在一些不合理的地方,尤其体现在基准的僵化和差异化方面,使得裁量基准在许多时候未能起到预期的作用,并引发了一些新的问题。对此,有必要从立法源头、制定裁量基准的方式、程序、内容等几个方面进行清理,以实现裁量基准的合理化。 Discretion benchmark is a way to control the discretion of administrative penalty in recent years. By refining the scope of discretion, it can provide concrete and specific standards for law enforcement so as to curb the abuse of discretion. However, there are still some unreasonable places in the formulation of the discretionary benchmark, especially in the rigid and differentiated benchmarks, which make the benchmark of discretion fail to play an anticipated role in many cases and lead to some new problems. In this regard, it is necessary to clean up from several aspects such as the source of legislation, the ways, procedures and contents for setting the benchmark of discretion so as to realize the rationalization of discretionary benchmarks.