论文部分内容阅读
几年前,中国行政法学界刚刚开始对国家赔偿立法进行研究,便非常迅速地对各国国家赔偿责任归责原则形成共识,即主要有三种归责原则:违法、过错、违法加过错。由于过错系一种自然人的主观心理状态,国家机关并不存在这种主观心理状态,而违法加过错双重要件没有必要,因此,我国理所当然地应采用违法归责原则。这一主流看法,不仅反映在国家赔偿法第2条的规定之中,而且,它实际上确立了国家赔偿的范围和大致框架。可惜的是,这种对各国情
A few years ago, when China’s administrative law circles just started to study the state compensation legislation, they reached a consensus very quickly on the principle of imputation of the national liability of various countries. There are mainly three principles of attribution: illegality, fault and illegality. Due to the fault of a natural person’s subjective state of mind, the state organs do not exist in this subjective state of mind, and the law plus the double fault of the error is not necessary, therefore, our country should take the principle of imputation. This mainstream view is not only reflected in the provisions of Article 2 of the State Compensation Law, but it actually establishes the scope and general framework of state compensation. It is a pity that this kind of situation