论文部分内容阅读
读了《化石》1991年3期刊载的《甲骨文与龟》一文,产生一些疑问,提出来向作者请教。1.文章说“武乙在纪元前1197年再迁朝歌,即上述的小屯村,殷以后称为‘殷墟’。”这里涉及到两个问题:第一,武乙是否迁都朝歌;第二,小屯村是否即所谓的朝歌。史籍中确有关于盘庚迁殷后,到庚丁或武乙或帝乙时又迁都朝歌的记载。杜预也曾注《左传·定公四年》云“殷墟,朝歌也”。因此,在小屯村初被发现时和甲骨文研究的初期,有人把小屯当成朝歌。其实,“殷墟”是后代人们对商代都邑故址的称呼,在我国至少曾有三个地方被称作“殷墟”,与本文有关的两个一在今河
Read the “fossil” 1991 3 issue of “Oracle and turtle,” a text, resulting in some questions raised to ask the author. 1. The article said: “Wu Yi moved to the Song Dynasty in 1197 before the era, which is Xiaotun Village and Yin later called the” Yin Ruins. “There are two issues involved here: First, Second, whether it is the so-called Chao-t’ang-chuh Dynasty. There is indeed a historical record on the relocation of Pan Geng Yin, Geng Ding or Wu Yi or Di B when they move the dynasty songs. Du pre-note ”Zuo Ding four years“ cloud ”Yin Ruins, North Korea also song.“ Therefore, early in the discovery of Xiaotun village and the early period of Oracle research, some people regarded Xiaotun as a dynasty song. In fact, the ”Yin Ruins“ are the descendants of the Shang dynasty, known as the site of the site, at least three places in our country have been called ”Yin Ruins", and the two related to this article in the river