论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨完全遮盖疗法及完全压抑疗法、单镜及双镜矫正对单眼先天性白内障术后弱视患儿的治疗效果。方法将58例患儿随机分为4组A组采取完全压抑疗法,对弱视眼行双镜矫正;B组采取完全压抑疗法,弱视眼给予单镜矫正;C组及D组均采用遮盖疗法,C组弱视眼以双镜矫正,D组以单镜矫正。结果治疗后视力提高≥2行者,A组75%,B组36%,C组73%,D组31%;双镜矫正与单镜矫正比较差异有显著性(P<005);而完全压抑疗法与完全遮盖疗法比较差异无显著性(P>005)。结论无论何种方法,只要达到解除主导眼对弱视眼的抑制,视力就可能提高;双镜矫正更符合人工晶体眼的生理特点,故治疗效果更为明显。
Objective To investigate the effect of complete masking and complete depressive therapy, single-lens and double-mirror correction on children with amblyopia after monocular congenital cataract surgery. Methods 58 cases of children were randomly divided into 4 groups of A group to take complete suppression therapy, amblyopia eyes underwent double mirror correction; B group to take complete suppression therapy, amblyopia eyes to be treated with monochromatic correction; C group and D group are covered therapy, C group, amblyopia with double mirror correction, D group, single-angle correction. Results After treatment, the visual acuity was increased by 2% in group A, 75% in group B, 36% in group B, 73% in group C, and 31% in group D. The differences between the two groups were significant (P <0.05) There was no significant difference between the therapy and complete covering therapy (P> 005). Conclusion No matter what method, as long as the lifting of the dominant eye to inhibit the inhibition of amblyopic eyes, visual acuity may be improved; double mirror correction more in line with the physiological characteristics of intraocular lens, so the treatment effect is more obvious.