论文部分内容阅读
构建了基于不同交货期策略的两供应商-单制造商协同供货模型。在对基于交货窗的协议交货期交货策略1和基于费用分担的可控交货期交货策略2进行分析和描述后,根据策略1建立了交货窗下基于协议交货期的两供应商-单制造商的stackelberg对策模型,分析了各自的最优决策;根据策略2建立了费用分担机制下基于可控交货期的两供应商-单制造商协调优化模型,给出了求解最优值的算法。接着分析了策略2优于策略1下的交货期压缩费用分担系数,给出了分担系数的范围,在此基础上建立了基于改进理想点的不对称Nash协商交货期压缩费用分担协调策略。最后通过数例对两种交货策略进行了分析比较并验证了本文的分担协调策略是有效的。
Constructed a two-supplier-single-manufacturer synergetic supply model based on different delivery strategies. After analyzing and expatiating on the delivery window of the protocol based on the delivery date of delivery agreement 1 and the controllable delivery period based on cost sharing strategy 2, we set up the delivery window under the strategy 1 based on the delivery date of the agreement Based on the strategy 2, a two-supplier-single manufacturer coordination optimization model based on controllable delivery time is established under the cost-sharing mechanism, and a two-supplier-single-manufacturer stackelberg game model is given. Algorithm for solving the optimal value. Then, we analyze the sharing cost of delivery cost under strategy 2 over strategy 1, and give the range of sharing coefficient. Based on this, we establish the asymmetric Nash negotiation cost-sharing coordination strategy . Finally, through several examples, it analyzes and compares the two delivery strategies and verifies that the sharing coordination strategy in this paper is effective.