论文部分内容阅读
本文探讨了伪狄奥尼修斯(即德尼斯)对费耶阿本德的影响,认为后期费耶阿本德从德尼斯那里吸收了一种形而上学主张,意在支持认识多元论。本文介绍了两者共同的认识论关切,即对人类获得关于终极实在的知识的可能性的否认;随后,考察了德尼斯在《神圣名称》中关于上帝“不可言说性”的论证;在此基础上探讨了费耶阿本德如何把德尼斯关于神的不可言说性解释引入他自己的形而上学,以便为认识多元论提供新颖论证;同时,说明充分了解德尼斯的影响对我们理解费耶阿本德有着重要意义。本文得出的结论是:德尼斯对后期费耶阿本德具有重要影响,但这种影响却被忽视了。
This article explores the impact of the Dionysius (Deneth) on Feyerabend, arguing that Feyerabend later absorbed a metaphysical claim from Denis intended to support the understanding of pluralism. This article describes the common epistemological concerns of both, namely, the denial of the possibility that human beings acquire the knowledge of the ultimate reality, and then examines Denis’s argument of God’s “non-declarativeness” in The Sacred Name; On this basis it explores how Feyerabend brought Denis’s unspeakable explanation of God into his own metaphysics in order to provide a novel argument for epistemic pluralism and at the same time illustrates the full understanding of the influence of Denis to our understanding of Feyera Bend has an important meaning. The conclusion of this paper is that Denis had an important influence on Feyerabend in the later period, but the influence was neglected.